Demographics details for Woodville, MS vs Buckner, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodville, MS vs Buckner, KY.
| Data | Woodville | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 869 | 3,658 |
| Median Age | 49.5 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $44,844 | $141,538 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodville vs Buckner
- The population in Buckner is higher at 3,658, compared to 869 in Woodville.
- Residents in Woodville have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 37.6 years in Buckner.
- Buckner has a higher median income of $141,538, compared to $44,844 in Woodville.
- In Buckner, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 38.0% in Woodville.
- Woodville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 0% in Buckner.
- The unemployment rate in Woodville is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.2% in Buckner.
Demographics
Demographics Woodville vs Buckner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodville | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 93 | 6 |
| White | -2 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodville vs Buckner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodville at 93% compared to 6% in Buckner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Buckner at 84% compared to -2% in Woodville.
- Both Woodville and Buckner have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodville at 5% compared to 4% in Buckner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Buckner at 6%, compared to 4% in Woodville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodville and Buckner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodville | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.0% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 33.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodville vs Buckner
- More residents in Woodville report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.3% in Buckner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodville at 21.1% compared to 21.0% in Buckner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodville at 26.4% compared to 17.3% in Buckner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Buckner at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Woodville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodville at 46.0% compared to 33.8% in Buckner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodville at 33.0% compared to 5.0% in Buckner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodville | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 36.8% (320) | 3.3% (121) |
| Less than High School | 10.5% (91) | 8.7% (320) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.1% (131) | 36.6% (1,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodville vs Buckner
- In Buckner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodville hold a high school diploma at 36.8% compared to 3.3% in Buckner.
- More residents in Woodville have less than a high school education at 10.5% compared to 8.7% in Buckner.
- In Buckner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 15.1% in Woodville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.