Demographics details for Woodville, MS vs Alum creek, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodville, MS vs Alum creek, WV.
Data | Woodville | Alum creek |
---|---|---|
Population | 869 | 1,420 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 47.4 years |
Median Income | $44,844 | $65,179 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 23% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodville vs Alum creek
- The population in Alum creek is higher at 1,420, compared to 869 in Woodville.
- Residents in Woodville have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 47.4 years in Alum creek.
- Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $44,844 in Woodville.
- In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 38.0% in Woodville.
- Woodville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 10% in Alum creek.
- The unemployment rate in Woodville is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Alum creek.
Demographics
Demographics Woodville vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodville | Alum creek |
---|---|---|
Black | 93 | Data is updating |
White | -2 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodville vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodville at 93% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to -2% in Woodville.
- Both Woodville and Alum creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodville at 5% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodville at 4% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodville and Alum creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodville | Alum creek |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.5% |
Depression | 21.1% | 29.5% |
Smoking | 26.4% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 11.0% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 46.0% | 40.1% |
Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodville vs Alum creek
- In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.3% in Woodville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 21.1% in Woodville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodville at 26.4% compared to 20.6% in Alum creek.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Alum creek at 15.1% compared to 11.0% in Woodville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodville at 46.0% compared to 40.1% in Alum creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodville at 33.0% compared to 30.0% in Alum creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodville | Alum creek |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 36.8% (320) | 34.9% (496) |
Less than High School | 10.5% (91) | 8.9% (126) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.1% (131) | 9.7% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodville vs Alum creek
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Woodville and Alum creek at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodville hold a high school diploma at 36.8% compared to 34.9% in Alum creek.
- More residents in Woodville have less than a high school education at 10.5% compared to 8.9% in Alum creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 9.7% in Alum creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.