Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Sacred heart, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Sacred heart, MN.
Data | Woodstock | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,907 | 498 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 53.5 years |
Median Income | $64,470 | $59,107 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Sacred heart
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 5,907, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
- The median age in Sacred heart is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 38.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470 compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
- Sacred heart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 60 | 87 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 19% compared to 13% in Sacred heart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Sacred heart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 9.6% |
Depression | 24.9% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.9% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 37.6% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Sacred heart
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 23.3% in Sacred heart.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 17.7% in Sacred heart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 37.6% in Sacred heart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Sacred heart |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 28.1% (140) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 28.5% (142) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 13.3% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 19.0% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacred heart at 28.5%, compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.