Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Rembrandt, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Rembrandt, IA.
Data | Woodstock | Rembrandt |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,907 | 205 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 56.9 years |
Median Income | $64,470 | $51,250 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Rembrandt
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 5,907, compared to 205 in Rembrandt.
- The median age in Rembrandt is higher at 56.9 years, compared to 38.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470 compared to $51,250 in Rembrandt.
- In Rembrandt, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Rembrandt.
- Rembrandt has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Rembrandt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Rembrandt |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 60 | 76 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Rembrandt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 0% in Rembrandt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rembrandt at 76% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 0% in Rembrandt.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Woodstock and Rembrandt at 19%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 5% in Rembrandt.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Rembrandt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Rembrandt |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.2% |
Depression | 24.9% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.9% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Rembrandt
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.6% in Rembrandt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 17.2% in Rembrandt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 18.1% in Rembrandt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rembrandt at 19.9% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 34.7% in Rembrandt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rembrandt at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Rembrandt |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 2.9% (6) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 18.5% (38) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 25.4% (52) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 9.3% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Rembrandt
- In Rembrandt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.0% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 18.5% in Rembrandt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rembrandt at 25.4%, compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 9.3% in Rembrandt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.