Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Hesperia, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Hesperia, CA.
| Data | Woodstock | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,907 | 100,744 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 32.2 years |
| Median Income | $64,470 | $67,698 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Hesperia
- The population in Hesperia is higher at 100,744, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 32.2 years in Hesperia.
- Hesperia has a higher median income of $67,698, compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- In Hesperia, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Hesperia at 13%, compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- Hesperia has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Hesperia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 60 | 15 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 62 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Hesperia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 4% in Hesperia.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 15% in Hesperia.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 2% in Hesperia.
- Hesperia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hesperia at 16%, compared to 11% in Woodstock.
- In Hesperia, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 40.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Hesperia
- In Hesperia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 20.1% in Hesperia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in Hesperia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 15.5% in Hesperia.
- Hesperia has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 38.9% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Hesperia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Hesperia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 1.6% (1,604) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 18.2% (18,342) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 25.4% (25,622) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 6.5% (6,534) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Hesperia
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.6% in Hesperia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 18.2% in Hesperia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hesperia at 25.4%, compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 6.5% in Hesperia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.