Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Fort lupton, CO.
| Data | Woodstock | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,907 | 8,829 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $64,470 | $71,293 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort lupton
- The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- In Fort lupton, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodstock and Fort lupton at 10%.
- Fort lupton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 60 | 26 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 53 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 11% in Woodstock.
- In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort lupton
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 1.6% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 16.2% (1,428) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 28.0% (2,476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.6% in Fort lupton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.