Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | Woodstock | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,907 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $64,470 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 83,269, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Folsom is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 38.4 years in Woodstock.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 60 | 54 |
| Asian | 4 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 19% compared to 14% in Folsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 10% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Folsom
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 16.4% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.