Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Crawley, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Crawley, WV.
Data | Woodstock | Crawley |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,907 | 229 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $64,470 | $45,000 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 55.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 5,907, compared to 229 in Crawley.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 35.0 years in Crawley.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470 compared to $45,000 in Crawley.
- In Crawley, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Crawley at 15%, compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- Crawley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Crawley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Crawley |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 60 | 100 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawley at 100% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 19% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 0% in Crawley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Crawley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Crawley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 38.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Crawley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.