Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Crawley, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Crawley, WV.

Data Woodstock Crawley
Population 5,907 229
Median Age 38.4 years 35.0 years
Median Income $64,470 $45,000
Married Families 32.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley

  • In Woodstock, the population is higher at 5,907, compared to 229 in Crawley.
  • Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 35.0 years in Crawley.
  • Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470 compared to $45,000 in Crawley.
  • In Crawley, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crawley at 15%, compared to 10% in Woodstock.
  • Crawley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.

Demographics

Demographics Woodstock vs Crawley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodstock Crawley
Black 6 Data is updating
White 60 100
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 0% in Crawley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawley at 100% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
  • The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 0% in Crawley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 19% compared to 0% in Crawley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 0% in Crawley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Crawley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodstock Crawley
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% Data is updating%
Depression 24.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 18.2% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 38.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 21.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley

  • More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodstock Crawley
No Schooling 2.0% (118) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.0% (1,121) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 17.2% (1,018) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (968) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Crawley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Crawley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.