Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs College park, MD.
| Data | Woodstock | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,907 | 34,190 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 21.6 years |
| Median Income | $64,470 | $76,973 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs College park
- The population in College park is higher at 34,190, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973, compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 32.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodstock and College park at 10%.
- College park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 23 |
| White | 60 | 39 |
| Asian | 4 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs College park
- In College park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 6% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 39% in College park.
- In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 4% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 19% compared to 17% in College park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 7% in College park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and College park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs College park
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 24.9% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 18.2% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 38.9% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | College park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 1.9% (657) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 6.4% (2,199) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 9.4% (3,210) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs College park
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.9% in College park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 9.4% in College park.
- In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.