Demographics details for Woodstock, VA vs Arma, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, VA vs Arma, KS.
| Data | Woodstock | Arma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,907 | 1,399 |
| Median Age | 38.4 years | 53.0 years |
| Median Income | $64,470 | $38,947 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Arma
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 5,907, compared to 1,399 in Arma.
- The median age in Arma is higher at 53.0 years, compared to 38.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470 compared to $38,947 in Arma.
- In Arma, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Arma at 13%, compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- Arma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Arma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Arma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 1 |
| White | 60 | 90 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Arma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 6% compared to 1% in Arma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arma at 90% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 4% compared to 0% in Arma.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 19% compared to 5% in Arma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 11% compared to 3% in Arma.
- In Arma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Arma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Arma
- In Arma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.9% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arma at 25.3% versus 24.9% in Woodstock.
- Arma has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 18.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arma at 21.0% compared to 16.2% in Woodstock.
- Arma has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 38.9% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arma at 28.0% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Arma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (118) | 0.8% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,121) | 25.4% (356) |
| Less than High School | 17.2% (1,018) | 8.4% (118) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (968) | 12.9% (181) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Arma
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Arma.
- In Arma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 19.0% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 17.2% compared to 8.4% in Arma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 12.9% in Arma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.