Demographics details for Woodstock, MN vs Pearisburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, MN vs Pearisburg, VA.
| Data | Woodstock | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110 | 2,832 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 46.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,804 | $70,905 |
| Married Families | 68.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Pearisburg
- The population in Pearisburg is higher at 2,832, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Pearisburg is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Pearisburg has a higher median income of $70,905, compared to $53,804 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 68.0% compared to 43.0% in Pearisburg.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodstock and Pearisburg at 10%.
- Pearisburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Pearisburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 95 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Pearisburg
- In Pearisburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 89% in Pearisburg.
- Both Woodstock and Pearisburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 3% compared to 1% in Pearisburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 2% compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Pearisburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Pearisburg
- In Pearisburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pearisburg at 24.8% versus 21.7% in Woodstock.
- Pearisburg has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 17.8% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 20.9% compared to 17.8% in Pearisburg.
- Pearisburg has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 34.6% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pearisburg at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Pearisburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1) | 0.7% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (22) | 33.2% (939) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (16) | 7.0% (199) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (12) | 15.0% (426) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Pearisburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Pearisburg.
- In Pearisburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.2% compared to 20.0% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 7.0% in Pearisburg.
- In Pearisburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 10.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.