Demographics details for Woodstock, MN vs Kaufman, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, MN vs Kaufman, TX.
| Data | Woodstock | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110 | 172,366 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $53,804 | $84,075 |
| Married Families | 68.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Kaufman
- The population in Kaufman is higher at 172,366, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Kaufman is higher at 34.6 years, compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Kaufman has a higher median income of $84,075, compared to $53,804 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 68.0% compared to 36.0% in Kaufman.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodstock and Kaufman at 10%.
- Kaufman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.1% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Kaufman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 13 |
| White | 95 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Kaufman
- In Kaufman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 53% in Kaufman.
- In Kaufman, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Woodstock.
- Kaufman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kaufman at 11%, compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Kaufman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Kaufman
- In Kaufman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kaufman at 22.6% versus 21.7% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 17.8% compared to 16.1% in Kaufman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 20.9% compared to 18.2% in Kaufman.
- Kaufman has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 34.6% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kaufman at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Kaufman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1) | 1.4% (2,482) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (22) | 12.9% (22,235) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (16) | 14.2% (24,496) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (12) | 13.1% (22,541) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Kaufman
- In Kaufman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 12.9% in Kaufman.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 14.2% in Kaufman.
- In Kaufman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 10.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.