Demographics details for Woodstock, MN vs Holiday, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, MN vs Holiday, FL.
| Data | Woodstock | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110 | 21,495 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $53,804 | $40,852 |
| Married Families | 68.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Holiday
- The population in Holiday is higher at 21,495, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Holiday is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $53,804 compared to $40,852 in Holiday.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 68.0% compared to 31.0% in Holiday.
- The poverty level is higher in Holiday at 13%, compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- Holiday has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Holiday provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 95 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Holiday
- In Holiday, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 61% in Holiday.
- In Holiday, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Woodstock.
- Holiday has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holiday at 11%, compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Holiday at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Holiday
- In Holiday, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Holiday at 24.5% versus 21.7% in Woodstock.
- Holiday has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 17.8% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 20.9% compared to 16.9% in Holiday.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 34.6% compared to 33.6% in Holiday.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Holiday at 18.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Holiday |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1) | 1.0% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (22) | 34.2% (7,351) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (16) | 15.3% (3,281) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (12) | 8.5% (1,817) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Holiday
- In Holiday, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- In Holiday, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.2% compared to 20.0% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holiday at 15.3%, compared to 14.5% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 8.5% in Holiday.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.