Demographics details for Woodstock, MN vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, MN vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Woodstock | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $53,804 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 68.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Cranston is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $53,804 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 68.0% compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 95 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Cranston
- In Cranston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Woodstock.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cranston at 9%, compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Cranston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 34.6% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Cranston
- In Cranston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 21.7% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 17.8% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 20.9% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 34.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cranston at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 20.0% (22) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (16) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (12) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Cranston
- In Cranston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 10.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.