Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Woodstock | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Whitehall
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- The median age in Whitehall is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.6% in Whitehall.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 83 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 3% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 83% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 2% compared to 0% in Whitehall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 12% in Whitehall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Whitehall
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Whitehall has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 17.7% in Woodstock.
- Whitehall has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 15.8% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 12.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.