Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Selma, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Selma, CA.
| Data | Woodstock | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 24,430 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $53,874 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Selma
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 24,430 in Selma.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $53,874 in Selma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 30.0% in Selma.
- The poverty level is higher in Selma at 20%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- Selma has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 5.7% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Selma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 59 | -2 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Selma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 3% compared to 1% in Selma.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to -2% in Selma.
- In Selma, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Woodstock.
- Selma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 23% in Woodstock.
- Both Woodstock and Selma have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- In Selma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Selma
- In Selma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.2% compared to 17.4% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Selma has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Selma at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 3.8% (938) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 14.6% (3,577) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 33.9% (8,285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 7.0% (1,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Selma
- In Selma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 14.6% in Selma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Selma at 33.9%, compared to 12.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.