Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Omaha, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Omaha, NE.
| Data | Woodstock | Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 485,153 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $70,202 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Omaha
- The population in Omaha is higher at 485,153, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 35.1 years in Omaha.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $70,202 in Omaha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Omaha.
- The poverty level is higher in Omaha at 13%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Omaha.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Omaha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 12 |
| White | 59 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Omaha
- In Omaha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Omaha at 60% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
- In Omaha, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 15% in Omaha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 8% in Omaha.
- In Omaha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 36.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Omaha
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.4% in Omaha.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.2% compared to 19.4% in Omaha.
- Omaha has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Omaha at 20.4% compared to 17.7% in Woodstock.
- Omaha has higher obesity rates at 36.3% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Omaha at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 1.7% (8,272) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 12.1% (58,598) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 11.0% (53,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 25.9% (125,578) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Omaha
- In Omaha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 12.1% in Omaha.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 11.0% in Omaha.
- In Omaha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.9% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.