Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Milledgeville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Milledgeville, GA.
Data | Woodstock | Milledgeville |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,665 | 16,837 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 26.5 years |
Median Income | $82,287 | $40,672 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Milledgeville
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 16,837 in Milledgeville.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 26.5 years in Milledgeville.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $40,672 in Milledgeville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 20.0% in Milledgeville.
- The poverty level is higher in Milledgeville at 24%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.5% in Milledgeville.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Milledgeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Milledgeville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 45 |
White | 59 | 47 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 23 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Milledgeville
- In Milledgeville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 47% in Milledgeville.
- In Milledgeville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 3% in Milledgeville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 2% in Milledgeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Milledgeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Milledgeville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 14.1% |
Depression | 20.2% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Milledgeville
- In Milledgeville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Milledgeville at 20.6% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Milledgeville has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 14.2% in Milledgeville.
- Milledgeville has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Milledgeville at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Milledgeville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 0.8% (139) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 11.0% (1,844) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 12.1% (2,041) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 13.3% (2,237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Milledgeville
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Milledgeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 11.0% in Milledgeville.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 12.1% in Milledgeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 13.3% in Milledgeville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.