Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Lafayette, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Lafayette, CA.
| Data | Woodstock | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 25,044 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $219,250 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Lafayette
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 25,044 in Lafayette.
- The median age in Lafayette is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Lafayette has a higher median income of $219,250, compared to $82,287 in Woodstock.
- In Lafayette, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 2% in Lafayette.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.1% in Lafayette.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Lafayette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Lafayette
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 3% compared to 1% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lafayette at 71% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
- In Lafayette, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 2% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 8% in Lafayette.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 10% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Lafayette at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 7.0% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 6.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 21.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Lafayette
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 12.5% in Lafayette.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.2% compared to 17.5% in Lafayette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 15.2% compared to 6.6% in Lafayette.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lafayette at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 32.4% compared to 21.1% in Lafayette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 0.3% (86) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 3.3% (814) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 2.1% (526) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 53.4% (13,378) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Lafayette
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 3.3% in Lafayette.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 2.1% in Lafayette.
- In Lafayette, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.4% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.