Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Gibsonburg, OH.
| Data | Woodstock | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 2,436 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $67,279 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Gibsonburg
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- The median age in Gibsonburg is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $67,279 in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Gibsonburg at 10%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.3% in Gibsonburg.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 59 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 3% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 2% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 9% in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Gibsonburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gibsonburg at 23.0% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Woodstock.
- Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gibsonburg at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 35.6% (867) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 5.1% (125) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 15.8% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.