Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Fairview, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Fairview, TN.
| Data | Woodstock | Fairview |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 9,910 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $82,344 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairview
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 9,910 in Fairview.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 34.9 years in Fairview.
- Fairview has a higher median income of $82,344, compared to $82,287 in Woodstock.
- In Fairview, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Fairview.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.1% in Fairview.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Fairview provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Fairview |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 59 | 75 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairview
- In Fairview, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairview at 75% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 2% compared to 1% in Fairview.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 12% in Fairview.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 8% in Fairview.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Fairview at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Fairview |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 31.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairview
- In Fairview, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairview at 26.5% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Fairview has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Fairview.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 32.4% compared to 31.4% in Fairview.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairview at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Fairview |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 1.4% (134) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 14.1% (1,402) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 8.8% (868) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 21.9% (2,169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairview
- In Fairview, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 14.1% in Fairview.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 8.8% in Fairview.
- In Fairview, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.