Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Alapaha, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Alapaha, GA.
| Data | Woodstock | Alapaha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 486 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 46.2 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $40,294 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Alapaha
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 25,665, compared to 486 in Alapaha.
- The median age in Alapaha is higher at 46.2 years, compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $40,294 in Alapaha.
- In Alapaha, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Alapaha at 10%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 5.0% in Alapaha.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Alapaha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Alapaha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 42 |
| White | 59 | 56 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Alapaha
- In Alapaha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 56% in Alapaha.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 2% compared to 0% in Alapaha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 2% in Alapaha.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 0% in Alapaha.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Alapaha at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Alapaha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Alapaha
- In Alapaha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alapaha at 20.7% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Alapaha has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 13.3% in Alapaha.
- Alapaha has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alapaha at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Alapaha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 1.9% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 33.1% (161) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 29.0% (141) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 16.0% (78) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Alapaha
- In Alapaha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- In Alapaha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.1% compared to 15.8% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alapaha at 29.0%, compared to 12.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 16.0% in Alapaha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.