Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Stonington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Stonington, CT.
Data | Woodstock | Stonington |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,350 | 18,545 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $100,913 | $92,222 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Stonington
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 37,350, compared to 18,545 in Stonington.
- The median age in Stonington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913 compared to $92,222 in Stonington.
- In Stonington, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodstock and Stonington at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.2% in Stonington.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Stonington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Stonington |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 2 |
White | 69 | 90 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 9 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Stonington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 11% compared to 2% in Stonington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stonington at 90% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 3% compared to 2% in Stonington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 9% compared to 4% in Stonington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 8% compared to 2% in Stonington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Stonington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Stonington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 12.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 30.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Stonington
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 30.2% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Stonington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Stonington
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 8.2% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 3.7% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.