Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Springfield, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Springfield, MA.

Data Woodstock Springfield
Population 37,350 154,064
Median Age 36.4 years 33.4 years
Median Income $100,913 $47,677
Married Families 40.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 5% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 6.9

Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Springfield

  • The population in Springfield is higher at 154,064, compared to 37,350 in Woodstock.
  • Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 33.4 years in Springfield.
  • Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913 compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Springfield at 20%, compared to 5% in Woodstock.
  • Springfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.

Demographics

Demographics Woodstock vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodstock Springfield
Black 11 21
White 69 8
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 9 49
Two or More Races 8 19
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 11% in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 8% in Springfield.
  • Both Woodstock and Springfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • Springfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 9% in Woodstock.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springfield at 19%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Springfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodstock Springfield
Mental Health Not Good 14.1% 21.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 14.9%
Depression 20.8% 25.8%
Smoking 12.1% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 14.3%
Obesity 30.2% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Springfield at 25.8% versus 20.8% in Woodstock.
  • Springfield has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.5% compared to 14.3% in Springfield.
  • Springfield has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springfield at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodstock Springfield
No Schooling 0.3% (107) 2.0% (3,005)
High School Diploma 8.2% (3,052) 16.7% (25,679)
Less than High School 3.7% (1,375) 23.8% (36,663)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.9% (12,290) 12.7% (19,500)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
  • In Springfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springfield at 23.8%, compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 12.7% in Springfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.