Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Woodstock | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,350 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $100,913 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Mcpherson
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 37,350, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Woodstock have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913 compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcpherson at 9%, compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 11% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 3% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 9% compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 8% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.8% compared to 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Mcpherson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Woodstock and Mcpherson at 0.3%.
- In Mcpherson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mcpherson at 5.8%, compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.