Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Kurtistown, HI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Kurtistown, HI.
| Data | Woodstock | Kurtistown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,350 | 2,896 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 49.4 years |
| Median Income | $100,913 | $80,625 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Kurtistown
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 37,350, compared to 2,896 in Kurtistown.
- The median age in Kurtistown is higher at 49.4 years, compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913 compared to $80,625 in Kurtistown.
- In Kurtistown, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Kurtistown at 9%, compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Kurtistown.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Kurtistown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Kurtistown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 28 |
| Asian | 3 | 39 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Kurtistown
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 11% compared to 0% in Kurtistown.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 28% in Kurtistown.
- In Kurtistown, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 3% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 9% compared to 6% in Kurtistown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kurtistown at 27%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Kurtistown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Kurtistown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 25.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Kurtistown
- In Kurtistown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Kurtistown.
- Kurtistown has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kurtistown at 19.0% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 30.2% compared to 25.6% in Kurtistown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kurtistown at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Kurtistown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 2.9% (83) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 18.7% (541) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 9.8% (284) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 23.9% (691) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Kurtistown
- In Kurtistown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- In Kurtistown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kurtistown at 9.8%, compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 23.9% in Kurtistown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.