Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Woodstock | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,350 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $100,913 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 37,350 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 15 |
| White | 69 | 67 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 11% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodstock at 3% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Woodstock and Gallatin at 9%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 8% compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- In Gallatin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.