Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Woodstock | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,350 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $100,913 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairfield
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 37,350, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 8 |
| White | 69 | 73 |
| Asian | 3 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 11% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 73% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 9% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 8% compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.8% compared to 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 6.3%, compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 32.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.