Demographics details for Woodstock, GA vs Beverly hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, GA vs Beverly hills, CA.
Data | Woodstock | Beverly hills |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,350 | 31,326 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 47.5 years |
Median Income | $100,913 | $116,771 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Beverly hills
- In Woodstock, the population is higher at 37,350, compared to 31,326 in Beverly hills.
- The median age in Beverly hills is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Beverly hills has a higher median income of $116,771, compared to $100,913 in Woodstock.
- In Beverly hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is higher in Beverly hills at 8%, compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- Beverly hills has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Beverly hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Beverly hills |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 2 |
White | 69 | 71 |
Asian | 3 | 13 |
Hispanic | 9 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Beverly hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodstock at 11% compared to 2% in Beverly hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beverly hills at 71% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Beverly hills, the Asian population stands at 13%, greater than 3% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 9% compared to 7% in Beverly hills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 8% compared to 7% in Beverly hills.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Beverly hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Beverly hills |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 14.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 8.2% |
Depression | 20.8% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 12.1% | 7.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 30.2% | 23.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Beverly hills
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 14.0% in Beverly hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.8% compared to 17.5% in Beverly hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 12.1% compared to 7.9% in Beverly hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beverly hills at 17.2% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodstock at 30.2% compared to 23.7% in Beverly hills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beverly hills at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Beverly hills |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (107) | 0.8% (258) |
High School Diploma | 8.2% (3,052) | 8.2% (2,574) |
Less than High School | 3.7% (1,375) | 5.1% (1,601) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.9% (12,290) | 52.0% (16,274) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Beverly hills
- In Beverly hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 8.2%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beverly hills at 5.1%, compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Beverly hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.0% compared to 32.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.