Demographics details for Woodsboro, MD vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodsboro, MD vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Woodsboro | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,156 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $127,000 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Woodsboro vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 1,156 in Woodsboro.
- Residents in Woodsboro have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Woodsboro has a higher median income of $127,000 compared to $126,615 in Parker.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Woodsboro and Parker at 45.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Parker at 5%, compared to 0% in Woodsboro.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Woodsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Woodsboro vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodsboro | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 2 |
| White | 65 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodsboro vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodsboro at 28% compared to 2% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 73% compared to 65% in Woodsboro.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Woodsboro.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Woodsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 3% in Woodsboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodsboro and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodsboro | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodsboro vs Parker
- More residents in Woodsboro report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodsboro at 21.3% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodsboro at 14.6% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Woodsboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodsboro at 33.6% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodsboro at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodsboro | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (160) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (101) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.7% (332) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodsboro vs Parker
- In Parker, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodsboro hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- More residents in Woodsboro have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 28.7% in Woodsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.