Demographics details for Woodsboro, MD vs Farmington hills, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodsboro, MD vs Farmington hills, MI.

Data Woodsboro Farmington hills
Population 1,156 82,737
Median Age 40.8 years 41.6 years
Median Income $127,000 $101,728
Married Families 45.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 2.8

Population Comparison: Woodsboro vs Farmington hills

  • The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 1,156 in Woodsboro.
  • The median age in Farmington hills is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 40.8 years in Woodsboro.
  • Woodsboro has a higher median income of $127,000 compared to $101,728 in Farmington hills.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodsboro at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Farmington hills.
  • The poverty level is higher in Farmington hills at 5%, compared to 0% in Woodsboro.
  • The unemployment rate in Woodsboro is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Woodsboro vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodsboro Farmington hills
Black 28 18
White 65 59
Asian 1 15
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodsboro vs Farmington hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodsboro at 28% compared to 18% in Farmington hills.
  • Woodsboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 59% in Farmington hills.
  • In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Woodsboro.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Woodsboro at 3% compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington hills at 6%, compared to 3% in Woodsboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodsboro and Farmington hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodsboro Farmington hills
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 8.0%
Depression 21.3% 19.0%
Smoking 14.6% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 17.5%
Obesity 33.6% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodsboro vs Farmington hills

  • More residents in Woodsboro report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Woodsboro at 21.3% compared to 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Woodsboro at 14.6% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 17.2% in Woodsboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Woodsboro at 33.6% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Woodsboro at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmington hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodsboro Farmington hills
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (488)
High School Diploma 13.8% (160) 9.5% (7,900)
Less than High School 8.7% (101) 6.0% (4,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 28.7% (332) 42.2% (34,948)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodsboro vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodsboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodsboro hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents in Woodsboro have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 6.0% in Farmington hills.
  • In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 28.7% in Woodsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.