Environment details: Woods hole MA
Water quality acceptable; few contaminants detected.
Environment details: Summerfield NC
Water quality good; protected from heavy pollution.
Compare Environment: Woods hole MA vs Summerfield NC
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Woods hole | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 449 | 925 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality acceptable; few contaminants detected. | Water quality good; protected from heavy pollution. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.99 | 1.66 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 61 | 36 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Woods hole vs Summerfield
- The water quality in Summerfield is superior at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Woods hole.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Woods hole with 1.99 compared to 1.66 in Summerfield.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Woods hole at 61 compared to 36 in Summerfield.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.