Demographics details for Woods hole, MA vs Lafayette, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woods hole, MA vs Lafayette, LA.
Data | Woods hole | Lafayette |
---|---|---|
Population | 992 | 121,389 |
Median Age | 65.8 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $72,031 | $58,850 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Woods hole vs Lafayette
- The population in Lafayette is higher at 121,389, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
- Residents in Woods hole have a higher median age of 65.8 years compared to 36.9 years in Lafayette.
- Woods hole has a higher median income of $72,031 compared to $58,850 in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woods hole at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Lafayette.
- The poverty level is higher in Lafayette at 18%, compared to 5% in Woods hole.
- Lafayette has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Woods hole.
Demographics
Demographics Woods hole vs Lafayette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woods hole | Lafayette |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 29 |
White | 96 | 58 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woods hole vs Lafayette
- In Lafayette, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- Woods hole has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 58% in Lafayette.
- In Lafayette, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Woods hole.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lafayette at 6%, compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woods hole and Lafayette at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woods hole | Lafayette |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 12.3% |
Depression | 21.5% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 9.5% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 26.0% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woods hole vs Lafayette
- In Lafayette, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lafayette at 26.4% versus 21.5% in Woods hole.
- Lafayette has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 18.9% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Woods hole and Lafayette at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woods hole | Lafayette |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (803) |
High School Diploma | 7.4% (73) | 14.8% (17,954) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.9% (10,815) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 67.2% (667) | 27.4% (33,262) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woods hole vs Lafayette
- In Lafayette, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Lafayette, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lafayette at 8.9%, compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woods hole hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 27.4% in Lafayette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.