Demographics details for Woods hole, MA vs Fort calhoun, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woods hole, MA vs Fort calhoun, NE.
| Data | Woods hole | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 992 | 1,115 |
| Median Age | 65.8 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $72,031 | $75,900 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Woods hole vs Fort calhoun
- The population in Fort calhoun is higher at 1,115, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
- Residents in Woods hole have a higher median age of 65.8 years compared to 44.1 years in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900, compared to $72,031 in Woods hole.
- In Fort calhoun, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort calhoun at 8%, compared to 5% in Woods hole.
- The unemployment rate in Woods hole is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.
Demographics
Demographics Woods hole vs Fort calhoun provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woods hole | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 96 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woods hole vs Fort calhoun
- In Fort calhoun, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- Woods hole has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 85% in Fort calhoun.
- Both Woods hole and Fort calhoun have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort calhoun at 8%, compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woods hole and Fort calhoun at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woods hole | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 26.0% | 33.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woods hole vs Fort calhoun
- More residents in Woods hole report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woods hole at 21.5% compared to 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
- Fort calhoun has a higher smoking rate at 14.0% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 19.3% in Woods hole.
- Fort calhoun has higher obesity rates at 33.3% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Woods hole and Fort calhoun at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woods hole | Fort calhoun |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (73) | 33.7% (376) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.5% (72) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 67.2% (667) | 14.4% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woods hole vs Fort calhoun
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Woods hole and Fort calhoun at 0.0%.
- In Fort calhoun, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort calhoun at 6.5%, compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woods hole hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 14.4% in Fort calhoun.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.