Demographics details for Woods hole, MA vs Ashland, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woods hole, MA vs Ashland, KS.
Data | Woods hole | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Population | 992 | 759 |
Median Age | 65.8 years | 50.1 years |
Median Income | $72,031 | $60,179 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woods hole vs Ashland
- In Woods hole, the population is higher at 992, compared to 759 in Ashland.
- Residents in Woods hole have a higher median age of 65.8 years compared to 50.1 years in Ashland.
- Woods hole has a higher median income of $72,031 compared to $60,179 in Ashland.
- In Ashland, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
- Woods hole has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Ashland.
- The unemployment rate in Woods hole is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Woods hole vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woods hole | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 96 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Woods hole vs Ashland
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Woods hole and Ashland at 0%.
- Woods hole has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 79% in Ashland.
- Both Woods hole and Ashland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ashland at 9%, compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- In Ashland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Woods hole.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woods hole | Ashland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 10.0% |
Depression | 21.5% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 9.5% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 26.0% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woods hole vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woods hole at 21.5% compared to 21.0% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashland at 19.5% compared to 19.3% in Woods hole.
- Ashland has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashland at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Woods hole.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woods hole | Ashland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 7.4% (73) | 17.8% (135) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.4% (56) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 67.2% (667) | 16.9% (128) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woods hole vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Ashland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashland at 7.4%, compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woods hole hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 16.9% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.