Demographics details for Woodruff, SC vs South windsor, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodruff, SC vs South windsor, CT.

Data Woodruff South windsor
Population 4,431 26,054
Median Age 37.3 years 42.0 years
Median Income $68,451 $90,964
Married Families 22.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.2

Population Comparison: Woodruff vs South windsor

  • The population in South windsor is higher at 26,054, compared to 4,431 in Woodruff.
  • The median age in South windsor is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.3 years in Woodruff.
  • South windsor has a higher median income of $90,964, compared to $68,451 in Woodruff.
  • In South windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 22.0% in Woodruff.
  • Woodruff has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in South windsor.
  • The unemployment rate in Woodruff is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.2% in South windsor.

Demographics

Demographics Woodruff vs South windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodruff South windsor
Black 24 9
White 70 85
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 4 3
Two or More Races 2 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodruff vs South windsor

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodruff at 24% compared to 9% in South windsor.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South windsor at 85% compared to 70% in Woodruff.
  • In South windsor, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Woodruff.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Woodruff at 4% compared to 3% in South windsor.
  • Both Woodruff and South windsor have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodruff and South windsor at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodruff South windsor
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% Data is updating%
Depression 24.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.3% Data is updating%
Obesity 36.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodruff vs South windsor

  • More residents in Woodruff report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Woodruff at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Woodruff at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Woodruff at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Woodruff at 36.4% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Woodruff at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodruff South windsor
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 20.5% (907) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 20.9% (926) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (589) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodruff vs South windsor

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Woodruff and South windsor at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodruff hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • More residents in Woodruff have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodruff hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.