Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Whitehall, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Whitehall, PA.
| Data | Woodridge | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,587 | 14,785 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 44.8 years |
| Median Income | $95,756 | $77,752 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Whitehall
- In Woodridge, the population is higher at 33,587, compared to 14,785 in Whitehall.
- The median age in Whitehall is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 37.7 years in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $77,752 in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Woodridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Whitehall at 8%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Whitehall.
Demographics
Demographics Woodridge vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodridge | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 4 |
| White | 53 | 78 |
| Asian | 13 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodridge at 11% compared to 4% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 78% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
- In Whitehall, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 13% in Woodridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodridge at 16% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodridge at 7% compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodridge and Whitehall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodridge | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 30.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 22.0% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Whitehall has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 21.4% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
- Whitehall has higher obesity rates at 30.9% compared to 30.6% in Woodridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodridge | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (340) | 2.0% (302) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (3,489) | 18.2% (2,688) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,732) | 7.7% (1,141) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.7% (10,993) | 31.1% (4,603) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Woodridge.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
- More residents in Woodridge have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 7.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 31.1% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.