Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Woodridge | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,587 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $95,756 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Picayune
- In Woodridge, the population is higher at 33,587, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- The median age in Picayune is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 37.7 years in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodridge at 43.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Picayune.
Demographics
Demographics Woodridge vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodridge | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 38 |
| White | 53 | 55 |
| Asian | 13 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 11% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Picayune at 55% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodridge at 13% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodridge at 16% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodridge at 7% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodridge and Picayune at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodridge | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodridge at 16.3% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 30.6% in Woodridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodridge | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (340) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (3,489) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,732) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.7% (10,993) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 8.1% in Woodridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.