Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Laurel, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Laurel, MT.
| Data | Woodridge | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,587 | 7,203 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $95,756 | $62,250 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Laurel
- In Woodridge, the population is higher at 33,587, compared to 7,203 in Laurel.
- Residents in Woodridge have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 36.5 years in Laurel.
- Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $62,250 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodridge at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 7%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.5% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Woodridge vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodridge | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 83 |
| Asian | 13 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodridge at 11% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurel at 83% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodridge at 13% compared to 2% in Laurel.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodridge at 16% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- Both Woodridge and Laurel have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodridge | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 23.8% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 27.8% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 30.6% in Woodridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodridge | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (340) | 0.2% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (3,489) | 21.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,732) | 7.7% (556) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.7% (10,993) | 10.8% (780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
- More residents in Woodridge have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 10.8% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.