Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Lamesa, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Lamesa, TX.
| Data | Woodridge | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,587 | 8,425 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,756 | $39,434 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Lamesa
- In Woodridge, the population is higher at 33,587, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- Residents in Woodridge have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
- Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodridge at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
- The poverty level is higher in Lamesa at 18%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.1% in Lamesa.
Demographics
Demographics Woodridge vs Lamesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodridge | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 3 |
| White | 53 | 5 |
| Asian | 13 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 73 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Lamesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodridge at 11% compared to 3% in Lamesa.
- Woodridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodridge at 13% compared to 0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 16% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lamesa at 19%, compared to 7% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodridge and Lamesa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodridge | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lamesa at 24.0% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Lamesa has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodridge at 16.3% compared to 15.6% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 30.6% in Woodridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodridge | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (340) | 3.3% (278) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (3,489) | 18.4% (1,547) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (2,732) | 34.2% (2,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.7% (10,993) | 8.7% (736) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 1.0% in Woodridge.
- In Lamesa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lamesa at 34.2%, compared to 8.1% in Woodridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.