Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Faribault, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Faribault, MN.
Data | Woodridge | Faribault |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,587 | 24,518 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 38.7 years |
Median Income | $95,756 | $58,881 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Faribault
- In Woodridge, the population is higher at 33,587, compared to 24,518 in Faribault.
- The median age in Faribault is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 37.7 years in Woodridge.
- Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $58,881 in Faribault.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodridge at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Faribault.
- The poverty level is higher in Faribault at 8%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.2% in Faribault.
Demographics
Demographics Woodridge vs Faribault provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodridge | Faribault |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 15 |
White | 53 | 64 |
Asian | 13 | 1 |
Hispanic | 16 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Faribault
- In Faribault, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 11% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Faribault at 64% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodridge at 13% compared to 1% in Faribault.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodridge at 16% compared to 14% in Faribault.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodridge at 7% compared to 5% in Faribault.
- In Faribault, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodridge | Faribault |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 11.0% |
Depression | 16.9% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 10.9% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 30.6% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Faribault
- In Faribault, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Faribault at 21.0% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Faribault has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Faribault at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
- Faribault has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 30.6% in Woodridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Faribault at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodridge | Faribault |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (340) | 2.1% (513) |
High School Diploma | 10.4% (3,489) | 22.3% (5,456) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (2,732) | 14.1% (3,450) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.7% (10,993) | 12.2% (2,982) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Faribault
- In Faribault, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.0% in Woodridge.
- In Faribault, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Faribault at 14.1%, compared to 8.1% in Woodridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 12.2% in Faribault.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.