Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Crawfordsville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Crawfordsville, IN.

Data Woodridge Crawfordsville
Population 33,587 16,479
Median Age 37.7 years 36.7 years
Median Income $95,756 $46,918
Married Families 43.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Crawfordsville

  • In Woodridge, the population is higher at 33,587, compared to 16,479 in Crawfordsville.
  • Residents in Woodridge have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 36.7 years in Crawfordsville.
  • Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodridge at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Crawfordsville at 13%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
  • The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.

Demographics

Demographics Woodridge vs Crawfordsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodridge Crawfordsville
Black 11 1
White 53 84
Asian 13 1
Hispanic 16 8
Two or More Races 7 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Crawfordsville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodridge at 11% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawfordsville at 84% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Woodridge at 13% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Woodridge at 16% compared to 8% in Crawfordsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Woodridge at 7% compared to 6% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodridge and Crawfordsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodridge Crawfordsville
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 12.9%
Depression 16.9% 26.1%
Smoking 10.9% 21.8%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 16.6%
Obesity 30.6% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Crawfordsville

  • In Crawfordsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crawfordsville at 26.1% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawfordsville at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
  • Crawfordsville has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 30.6% in Woodridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodridge Crawfordsville
No Schooling 1.0% (340) 0.7% (114)
High School Diploma 10.4% (3,489) 23.1% (3,814)
Less than High School 8.1% (2,732) 19.9% (3,274)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.7% (10,993) 10.4% (1,714)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Crawfordsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • In Crawfordsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 10.4% in Woodridge.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawfordsville at 19.9%, compared to 8.1% in Woodridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.