Demographics details for Woodridge, IL vs Bellingham, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodridge, IL vs Bellingham, WA.
Data | Woodridge | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,587 | 93,896 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $95,756 | $64,026 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodridge vs Bellingham
- The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 33,587 in Woodridge.
- Residents in Woodridge have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Woodridge has a higher median income of $95,756 compared to $64,026 in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodridge at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
- The poverty level is higher in Bellingham at 11%, compared to 5% in Woodridge.
- The unemployment rate in Woodridge is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.5% in Bellingham.
Demographics
Demographics Woodridge vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodridge | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 1 |
White | 53 | 74 |
Asian | 13 | 6 |
Hispanic | 16 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodridge vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodridge at 11% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bellingham at 74% compared to 53% in Woodridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodridge at 13% compared to 6% in Bellingham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodridge at 16% compared to 10% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellingham at 8%, compared to 7% in Woodridge.
- In Bellingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Woodridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodridge | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 10.9% |
Depression | 16.9% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 10.9% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 30.6% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodridge vs Bellingham
- In Bellingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 12.5% in Woodridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 16.9% in Woodridge.
- Bellingham has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 10.9% in Woodridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 16.3% in Woodridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodridge at 30.6% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bellingham at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodridge | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (340) | 0.5% (454) |
High School Diploma | 10.4% (3,489) | 8.8% (8,220) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (2,732) | 6.2% (5,781) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.7% (10,993) | 28.9% (27,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodridge vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a high school diploma at 10.4% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- More residents in Woodridge have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.7% compared to 28.9% in Bellingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.