Demographics details for Woodland, CA vs Portsmouth, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodland, CA vs Portsmouth, NH.
| Data | Woodland | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,462 | 22,713 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $84,494 | $100,169 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 2.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodland vs Portsmouth
- In Woodland, the population is higher at 61,462, compared to 22,713 in Portsmouth.
- The median age in Portsmouth is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 37.0 years in Woodland.
- Portsmouth has a higher median income of $100,169, compared to $84,494 in Woodland.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Woodland and Portsmouth at 40.0%.
- Woodland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Portsmouth.
- The unemployment rate in Woodland is higher at 6.0%, compared to 2.1% in Portsmouth.
Demographics
Demographics Woodland vs Portsmouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodland | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 21 | 89 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 49 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodland vs Portsmouth
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodland at 2% compared to 1% in Portsmouth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Portsmouth at 89% compared to 21% in Woodland.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodland at 7% compared to 4% in Portsmouth.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodland at 49% compared to 2% in Portsmouth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodland at 20% compared to 4% in Portsmouth.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodland at 1% compared to 0% in Portsmouth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodland | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 27.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodland vs Portsmouth
- More residents in Woodland report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Portsmouth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Portsmouth at 22.8% versus 18.8% in Woodland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodland at 12.2% compared to 11.5% in Portsmouth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Portsmouth at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in Woodland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodland at 28.9% compared to 27.6% in Portsmouth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodland at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Portsmouth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodland | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (1,223) | 0.3% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (8,533) | 10.8% (2,450) |
| Less than High School | 22.2% (13,649) | 4.0% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.0% (11,706) | 47.4% (10,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodland vs Portsmouth
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodland have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Portsmouth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodland hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 10.8% in Portsmouth.
- More residents in Woodland have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 4.0% in Portsmouth.
- In Portsmouth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.4% compared to 19.0% in Woodland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.