Demographics details for Woodland, CA vs North richland hills, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodland, CA vs North richland hills, TX.

Data Woodland North richland hills
Population 61,462 70,663
Median Age 37.0 years 38.7 years
Median Income $84,494 $88,656
Married Families 40.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 6.0 3.9

Population Comparison: Woodland vs North richland hills

  • The population in North richland hills is higher at 70,663, compared to 61,462 in Woodland.
  • The median age in North richland hills is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Woodland.
  • North richland hills has a higher median income of $88,656, compared to $84,494 in Woodland.
  • In North richland hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodland.
  • Woodland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in North richland hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Woodland is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.9% in North richland hills.

Demographics

Demographics Woodland vs North richland hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodland North richland hills
Black 2 6
White 21 59
Asian 7 4
Hispanic 49 20
Two or More Races 20 10
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Woodland vs North richland hills

  • In North richland hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Woodland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in North richland hills at 59% compared to 21% in Woodland.
  • The Asian population is larger in Woodland at 7% compared to 4% in North richland hills.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Woodland at 49% compared to 20% in North richland hills.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Woodland at 20% compared to 10% in North richland hills.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodland and North richland hills at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodland North richland hills
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 10.3%
Depression 18.8% 23.6%
Smoking 12.2% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 18.4%
Obesity 28.9% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodland vs North richland hills

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Woodland and North richland hills at 16.0%.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in North richland hills at 23.6% versus 18.8% in Woodland.
  • North richland hills has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 12.2% in Woodland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in North richland hills at 18.4% compared to 16.4% in Woodland.
  • North richland hills has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 28.9% in Woodland.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Woodland and North richland hills at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodland North richland hills
No Schooling 2.0% (1,223) 0.9% (621)
High School Diploma 13.9% (8,533) 12.9% (9,109)
Less than High School 22.2% (13,649) 9.6% (6,756)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.0% (11,706) 24.5% (17,331)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodland vs North richland hills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodland have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.9% in North richland hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodland hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 12.9% in North richland hills.
  • More residents in Woodland have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 9.6% in North richland hills.
  • In North richland hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.5% compared to 19.0% in Woodland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.