Demographics details for Woodland, CA vs Bowman, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodland, CA vs Bowman, SC.
| Data | Woodland | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,462 | 769 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 47.2 years |
| Median Income | $84,494 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Woodland vs Bowman
- In Woodland, the population is higher at 61,462, compared to 769 in Bowman.
- The median age in Bowman is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 37.0 years in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher median income of $84,494 compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodland at 40.0% compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bowman at 15%, compared to 12% in Woodland.
- The unemployment rate in Woodland is higher at 6.0%, compared to 5.0% in Bowman.
Demographics
Demographics Woodland vs Bowman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodland | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 66 |
| White | 21 | 33 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 49 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodland vs Bowman
- In Bowman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 2% in Woodland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bowman at 33% compared to 21% in Woodland.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodland at 7% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodland at 49% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodland at 20% compared to 1% in Bowman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodland at 1% compared to 0% in Bowman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodland | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodland vs Bowman
- In Bowman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in Woodland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bowman at 19.3% versus 18.8% in Woodland.
- Bowman has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 12.2% in Woodland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodland at 16.4% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 28.9% in Woodland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Woodland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodland | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (1,223) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (8,533) | 26.4% (203) |
| Less than High School | 22.2% (13,649) | 12.6% (97) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.0% (11,706) | 7.3% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodland vs Bowman
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodland have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
- In Bowman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 13.9% in Woodland.
- More residents in Woodland have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 12.6% in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.