Demographics details for Woodbury, VT vs Draper, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodbury, VT vs Draper, UT.

Data Woodbury Draper
Population 887 50,731
Median Age 46.0 years 33.6 years
Median Income $75,000 $126,041
Married Families 60.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.0 4.0

Population Comparison: Woodbury vs Draper

  • The population in Draper is higher at 50,731, compared to 887 in Woodbury.
  • Residents in Woodbury have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
  • Draper has a higher median income of $126,041, compared to $75,000 in Woodbury.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodbury at 60.0% compared to 45.0% in Draper.
  • Woodbury has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Draper.
  • Draper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.0% in Woodbury.

Demographics

Demographics Woodbury vs Draper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodbury Draper
Black Data is updating 2
White 95 81
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 1 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodbury vs Draper

  • In Draper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
  • Woodbury has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 81% in Draper.
  • In Draper, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Woodbury.
  • Draper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Woodbury.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Draper at 6%, compared to 1% in Woodbury.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodbury and Draper at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodbury Draper
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.7%
Depression Data is updating% 25.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 7.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.7%
Obesity Data is updating% 28.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodbury vs Draper

  • In Draper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Draper at 25.3% versus 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Draper has a higher smoking rate at 7.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Draper at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • Draper has higher obesity rates at 28.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Draper at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodbury Draper
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (347)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.4% (3,771)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.1% (2,077)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 30.1% (15,258)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodbury vs Draper

  • In Draper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • In Draper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.4% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Draper at 4.1%, compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
  • In Draper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.