Demographics details for Woodbury, TN vs Sandpoint, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodbury, TN vs Sandpoint, ID.
Data | Woodbury | Sandpoint |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,804 | 9,777 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $51,528 | $60,208 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodbury vs Sandpoint
- The population in Sandpoint is higher at 9,777, compared to 2,804 in Woodbury.
- The median age in Sandpoint is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 35.1 years in Woodbury.
- Sandpoint has a higher median income of $60,208, compared to $51,528 in Woodbury.
- In Sandpoint, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Woodbury.
- The poverty level is identical in both Woodbury and Sandpoint at 10%.
- Sandpoint has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Woodbury vs Sandpoint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodbury | Sandpoint |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 89 | 85 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodbury vs Sandpoint
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodbury at 4% compared to 0% in Sandpoint.
- Woodbury has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 85% in Sandpoint.
- In Sandpoint, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Woodbury.
- Sandpoint has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sandpoint at 7%, compared to 3% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodbury and Sandpoint at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodbury | Sandpoint |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.3% |
Depression | 30.2% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 23.4% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodbury vs Sandpoint
- More residents in Woodbury report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 16.8% in Sandpoint.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodbury at 30.2% compared to 23.8% in Sandpoint.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodbury at 23.4% compared to 17.9% in Sandpoint.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sandpoint at 16.4% compared to 15.6% in Woodbury.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodbury at 35.6% compared to 32.5% in Sandpoint.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodbury at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Sandpoint.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodbury | Sandpoint |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 2.5% (244) |
High School Diploma | 28.8% (807) | 10.3% (1,005) |
Less than High School | 17.9% (502) | 12.8% (1,249) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (271) | 24.2% (2,370) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodbury vs Sandpoint
- In Sandpoint, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 10.3% in Sandpoint.
- More residents in Woodbury have less than a high school education at 17.9% compared to 12.8% in Sandpoint.
- In Sandpoint, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 9.7% in Woodbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.