Demographics details for Woodbury, TN vs Pittsburg, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodbury, TN vs Pittsburg, KS.
| Data | Woodbury | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,804 | 20,658 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 25.7 years |
| Median Income | $51,528 | $42,371 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Woodbury vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 20,658, compared to 2,804 in Woodbury.
- Residents in Woodbury have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Woodbury has a higher median income of $51,528 compared to $42,371 in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 25.0% in Woodbury.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsburg at 23%, compared to 10% in Woodbury.
- The unemployment rate in Woodbury is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Woodbury vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodbury | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 89 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodbury vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodbury at 4% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- Woodbury has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 78% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Woodbury.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 5%, compared to 3% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodbury and Pittsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodbury | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 30.2% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodbury vs Pittsburg
- More residents in Woodbury report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 19.3% in Pittsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodbury at 30.2% compared to 25.0% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 23.4% in Woodbury.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 15.6% in Woodbury.
- Pittsburg has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 35.6% in Woodbury.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodbury at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodbury | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.7% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 28.8% (807) | 13.0% (2,686) |
| Less than High School | 17.9% (502) | 5.9% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (271) | 17.2% (3,562) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodbury vs Pittsburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Woodbury and Pittsburg at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Woodbury have less than a high school education at 17.9% compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 9.7% in Woodbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.