Demographics details for Woodbury, TN vs Paupack, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodbury, TN vs Paupack, PA.
| Data | Woodbury | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,804 | 1,000 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $51,528 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 300.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Woodbury vs Paupack
- In Woodbury, the population is higher at 2,804, compared to 1,000 in Paupack.
- The median age in Paupack is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.1 years in Woodbury.
- Paupack has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $51,528 in Woodbury.
- In Paupack, the percentage of married families is higher at 300.0%, compared to 25.0% in Woodbury.
- Woodbury has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Paupack.
- Paupack has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Woodbury vs Paupack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodbury | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 89 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodbury vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodbury at 4% compared to 2% in Paupack.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Paupack at 90% compared to 89% in Woodbury.
- In Paupack, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Woodbury.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodbury at 4% compared to 3% in Paupack.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodbury at 3% compared to 0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodbury and Paupack at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodbury | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 30.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodbury vs Paupack
- More residents in Woodbury report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodbury at 30.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodbury at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodbury at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodbury at 35.6% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodbury at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodbury | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.8% (807) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 17.9% (502) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (271) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodbury vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- More residents in Woodbury have less than a high school education at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.